100 Ideas

"One a year" - A pre-retrospective: 2008-2108

Synthetic Biology or Synthetic Genomics?


Synthetic Biology is not a new term.  In Laying the Foundations for a Bio-Economy[1], Rob Carlson writes:

“‘Synthetic biology‘ was, until recently, a phrase found in literature at least decades old (Szybalski and Skalka 1978), first appearing nearly a century earlier (Keller 2002), but not used much in the last thirty years.”

Drew Endy tends to emphasize that Synthetic Biology is development and application of engineering principles to the genetic engineering technology stack: DNA sequencing, synthesis, PCR + part & measurement standardization, insulation, and abstraction hierarchies for biological systems [4].

Other people use synthetic biology to mean progress in building a completely synthetic cell.

Craig Venter sort of ignores the “hardcore” SB engineering dogma and just talks about “Synthetic Genomics” (also the name of his company) as the ability to synthesize a genome de novo.

Of this set, I’m most excited about the hardcore SB dogma, which to me is the most visionary and novel.

[1] http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2398717

[2] http://fora.tv/2008/11/17/Drew_Endy_and_Jim_Thomas_Debate_Synthetic_Biology#chapter_04

Colophon

I'm Mac Cowell. I'm an amateur biologist. I'm a part of diybio.org. I'm interested in synthetic biology and refactoring and reengineering existing biological tools and techniques to be cheaper, easier, safer, and more accessible.

Syndicate

Activity

No comments, leave your comment or trackback.

Leave a Reply


Search

The archives run deep. Feel free to search older content using topic keywords.